Google+ China's GDP may have overvalued, and at least 2% overvalued / 中國公佈的GDP有高估的可能,且至少高估2% <g:plusone size="medium"></g:plusone> - Lee Li's Speculator Ponders

網頁

StockPreacher & StockPicker :

股價低買高賣的準則

一、前言
股市競爭比戰場還激烈,要買什麼股票?要賣什麼股票?必須要有一一致性、完備性且是決定性的公設(postulate)或公理(axiom)做為股市戰場的作戰準則 --- 低買高賣。

二、股價低買高賣的準則
股價低於內在價值時就堅決分批買入,以實現“低買”作戰準則;反過來,股價遠高於內在價值時,就應該分批賣出股票,以實現“高賣”作戰準則。(確定你持股的股價比(P/X)在本blog表頭分配圖的哪一區間,及其臨界點)

三、買什麼股票的作戰準則
當股價 / 內在價值處於收歛,其趨近於臨界值域下限時是最佳的買入時價區域,也就是:d(P/V) → 0,且d(d(P/V)) > 0 ;

四、賣什麼股票的作戰準則
當股價 / 內在價值處於發散,其趨近於臨界值域上限時是最佳的賣出時價區域,也就是:d(P/V) → 0,且d(d(P/V)) < 0 ;

五、實戰之實證與情報
此實證與情報等情資已於MICS-Stock Picker表裡全盤托出,細心的價值投資作戰戰士,請自行察閱。

本文更詳盡的解析,請搜尋下表資料裡的電子書:恐慌與機會。

你可以在最近的分析文章中及MICS-Stock Picker表中挑選到所需要價值投資的股票標的。

2008/8/23

China's GDP may have overvalued, and at least 2% overvalued / 中國公佈的GDP有高估的可能,且至少高估2%

China's growth rate of GDP, the first quarter last year was 11.1 %, in the second quarter was 11.5%, in the third quarter was 11.5 %, the fourth quarter was 11.4%, in the first quarter was 10.6 %. In July of last year , the United States began the global financial crisis seems to have no impact on China, it's very stable, China's as a developing country, it's economic growth performance is so stable, is very surprising, Even a developed country will have the so-called output volatility, the volatility in developing countries should be greater, but in China not see the data, there are two possibilities, one is the data with problems ,and another that it is a miracle, so it is perfect.
I can not believe the China's statistics. China's reform and opening up from 1978 to 2004, its annual GDP growth rate is an annual average of 9.3%, this is a very high figure, the analysis of this 9.3%, of which 2 % is from the employment growth, 3.2% from the physical capital investment, 0.2% from the education and human capital . By macro economic model to compare input and the output data, the increase of regression residuals of all elements of total factor productivity( TFP) in China ,is an annual average of 3.8 % during this period, this is a very high figure.
During the same period in East Asia (excluding China) in 1980 to 2003, GDP increased 6.1%, employment increased 2.4 %, the East Asian region no one-child restrictions, so labor is relatively high growth rate, a 2.2% in capital, 0.5 % in education, including Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong and other major economies in East Asia during this period all factor productivity increased by only 0.9 percent, if consider economic development in East Asia earlier, in the view of 1960-1980 , All of the elements of productivity increased by only 1.2 %. This means that once created the economic miracle of the East Asian region, the TFP only about 1%, but China has 3.8 %, and the major increase of TFP came from the manufacturing sector.This figure is difficult to interpret and imagine.
So China's fundamentals are not sufficient to support its stock market to be up.

沒有留言: